Solid solutions of pyridinium halobismuthates

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Solid solutions of pyridinium bromo-iodobismutates were isolated from aqueous solutions and structurally characterized. The composition of the resulting solid solutions [HPy]BiX4 and [HPy]3Bi2X9 (X = Br, I) was found to depend on the ratios of pyridinium/bismuth and bromine/iodine in the initial solution. The existence of five polymorphic modifications in the system for [HPy]BiX4 compounds was shown. Two different polymorphs were found for iodobismuthate [HPy]BiI4.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

P. Buikin

HSE University; Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: peterzzz@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 101000, Moscow; 119991 Moscow

A. Zhavoronkov

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: peterzzz@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 119991 Moscow

A. Ilyukhin

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: peterzzz@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 119991 Moscow

V. Kotov

HSE University; Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: peterzzz@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 101000, Moscow; 119991 Moscow

参考

  1. Groom C.R., Bruno I.J., Lightfoot M.P. et al. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 2016. V. 72. № 2. P. 171. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520616003954
  2. Adonin S.A., Gorokh I.D., Novikov A.S. et al. // Chem. — A Eur. J. 2017. V. 23. № 62. P. 15612. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201703747
  3. Kotov V.Y., Ilyukhin A.B., Buikin P.A. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2019. V. 29. № 5. P. 537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2019.09.020
  4. Robertson B.K., McPherson W.G., Meyers E.A. // J. Phys. Chem. 1967. V. 71. № 11. P. 3531. https://doi.org/ 10.1021/J100870A028/ASSET/J100870A028.FP.PNG_V03
  5. Li T., Hu Y., Morrison C.A. et al. // Sustain. Energy Fuels. 2017. V. 1. № 2. P. 308. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6se00061d
  6. Balabanova S.P., Buikin P.A., Ilyukhin A.B. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 7. P. 1018. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622070038
  7. Usol’tsev A.N., Shentseva I.A., Shayapov V.R. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 10. P. 1482. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621100193
  8. Buikin P.A., Ilyukhin A.B., Baranchikov A.E. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2018. V. 28. № 5. P. 490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2018.09.012
  9. Li A., Wu M., Zhang J. et al. // Dalton Trans. 2023. V. 52. № 16. P. 5065. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DT00210A
  10. Hu X., Wang J., Mao W. et al. // ChemistrySelect. 2021. V. 6. № 5. P. 1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/SLCT.202004010
  11. Kotov V.Y., Ilyukhin A.B., Korlyukov A.A. et al. // New J. Chem. 2018. V. 42. № 8. P. 6354. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nj04948j
  12. Chen Y., Yang Z., Guo C.X. et al. // Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010. № 33. P. 5326. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201000755
  13. Jóźków J., Medycki W., Zaleski J. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001. V. 3. № 15. P. 3222. https://doi.org/10.1039/B102697F
  14. Tarasiewicz J., Jakubas R., Bator G. et al. // J. Mol. Struct. 2009. V. 932. № 1–3. P. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2009.05.034
  15. Aurivillius B., Stålhandske C., Eriksen T.E. et al. // Acta Chem. Scand. 1978. V. 32a. P. 715. https://doi.org/10.3891/ACTA.CHEM.SCAND.32A-0715
  16. James S.C., Lawson Y.G., Norman N.C. et al. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2000. V. 56. № 4. P. 427 https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100000263/AV1032IISUP3.HKL
  17. Adonin S.A., Gorokh I.D., Novikov A.S. et al. // Polyhedron. 2018. V. 139. P. 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2017.11.002
  18. Li S.G., Chen L., Xiang Y. // J. Mol. Struct. 2017. V. 1130. P. 617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.11.025
  19. Möbs J., Gerhard M., Heine J. // Dalton Trans. 2020. V. 49. № 41. P. 14397. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0DT03427D
  20. Brucker // APEX3 2016. Madison.
  21. Sheldrick G.M. // Programs Scaling Absorpt. Correct. Area Detect. Data, 1997.
  22. Sheldrick G.M. // TWINABS 2012/1, Bruker, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2012.
  23. Sheldrick G.M. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct. Chem. 2015. V. 71. P. 3. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229614024218
  24. Coelho A. // Bruker AXS GmbH 2009.
  25. Kubelka P., Munk F. // Z. Tech. Phys. 1931. V. 12. № 1930. P. 593. http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/pubs/kubelka.pdf
  26. Kotov V.Y., Lunkov I.S., Buikin P.A. et al. // New J. Chem. 2023. V. 47. № 5. P. 2666. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ05184B
  27. Leblanc N., Mercier N., Allain M. et al. // J. Solid State Chem. 2012. V. 195. P. 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2012.03.020
  28. Hu Y.Q., Hui H.Y., Lin W.Q. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2019. V. 58. № 24. P. 16346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01439

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Fragment of structure I.

下载 (160KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. The dependence of the proportion of iodine in solid solutions (IEDX) on the iodine content in the mother liquor (Isolv) with a different ratio [HPy]+ : Bi3+.

下载 (55KB)
索引源数据
4. Рис. 3. Зависимость значений оптической ширины запрещенной зоны (Eg) от доли иода в твердых растворах p3–p8 (IEDX). По оси у Еg, эВ.

下载 (54KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024